This reading reminds me of a news I saw recently. An art major student in a university made a capstone that was literally cardboard stacked up together. People started judging it on the internet and the student couldn’t handle the pressure so started explaining the work. I think that is unnecessary and it breaks the art piece. I believe that a big part or an artwork’s value is it’s openness to interpretations. Different people may interpret it differently. Judging it and saying it is not art is also an interpretation, which is part of the artistic value it has. But if the creator comes in person and describes it, all the interpretations collapse into THE interpretation and it reduces it’s artistic value.